26 C
New York
Sunday, July 20, 2025

Senate weighs amendments to $9 billion cuts to overseas support, public media funding


Washington — The Senate kicked off one other prolonged vote collection Wednesday afternoon as Congress works to ship on President Trump’s request to rescind $9 billion in spending by Friday. The “vote-a-rama” continued into the in a single day hours.

The Senate narrowly superior the request late Tuesday. Three Republicans opposed the package deal and Vice President JD Vance needed to forged the 2 tie-breaking votes to maneuver it ahead.

The Home accredited the unique $9.4 billion rescissions request final month, however it has confronted pushback within the Senate, the place some Republicans have opposed slashing overseas support and public broadcasting funding. 

Each chambers must approve the request earlier than it expires on the finish of the week, or the funds must be spent as lawmakers beforehand meant. The Senate’s choice to contemplate amendments to the package deal means the Home might want to approve the ultimate Senate model.

The rescissions request targets roughly $8 billion for overseas help packages, together with america Company for Worldwide Growth, or USAID. The package deal additionally consists of about $1 billion in cuts for the Company for Public Broadcasting, which helps public radio and tv stations, together with NPR and PBS. 

Senate Republicans met with Mr. Trump’s funds director, Russell Vought, on Tuesday as GOP leaders labored to get holdouts on board forward of the procedural votes later within the day. Vought left the assembly saying there could be a substitute modification that may remove $400 million in cuts to an AIDS prevention program, one of many major considerations of Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine.

Senate Majority Chief John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, mentioned he hoped the Home would settle for the “small modification.” 

When requested in regards to the $400 million change, Home Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, informed reporters, “we needed them to cross it unaltered like we did.” 

“We have to claw again funding, and we’ll do as a lot as we’re ready,” Johnson added. 

However the change didn’t fulfill Collins, who voted in opposition to advancing the package deal. Collins was joined by two different Republicans senators: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. 

The holdouts mentioned the administration’s request lacks particulars about how the cuts might be carried out. 

“To hold out our Constitutional accountability, we should always know precisely what packages are affected and the results of rescissions,” Collins mentioned in a press release Tuesday. 

In a flooring speech forward of the procedural votes, Murkowski additionally mentioned Congress mustn’t surrender its funds oversight. 

“I do not need us to go from one reconciliation invoice to a rescissions package deal to a different rescissions package deal to a reconciliation package deal to a seamless decision,” she mentioned. “We’re lawmakers. We ought to be legislating. What we’re getting now’s a path from the White Home and being informed, ‘That is the precedence, we would like you to execute on it, we’ll be again with you with one other spherical.’ I do not settle for that.” 

Cuts to native radio and tv stations, particularly in rural areas the place they’re crucial for speaking emergency messages, was one other level of competition within the Senate. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who had considerations in regards to the cuts, mentioned funding could be reallocated from local weather funds to maintain stations in tribal areas working “with out interruption.” 

Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina mentioned he would vote for the package deal, however anticipated that Congress would later should attempt to repair a number of the cuts as soon as they decide the impacts. 

“I think we’ll discover on the market are some issues that we’ll remorse,” he mentioned Wednesday on the Senate flooring. “I think that after we can we’ll have to return again and repair it, just like what I am making an attempt to do with the invoice I voted in opposition to a few weeks in the past — the so-called large, stunning invoice, that I believe we’ll have to return and work on.” 

contributed to this report.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles