25.7 C
New York
Saturday, July 26, 2025

Newton faculty psychologist who was fired for refusing Covid photographs sues, cites her faith, Matthew, aborted infants and experimental, harmful substances


A college psychologist for Newton Public Faculties right this moment sued over her 2022 firing for refusing Covid-19 photographs, saying she had a professional spiritual cause to keep away from the photographs: Her Greek Orthodox church is towards the usage of substances derived from aborted infants, which she claims Covid-19 vaccines are from.

Additionally, Matthew says the wholesome do not want docs and she or he’s wholesome, apart from the time she got here down with Covid-19, however that was God’s will.

In her swimsuit, filed in US District Court docket in Boston, Sydni O’Connell is searching for a court docket order to formally slap Newton Public Faculties for its alleged violation of her First Modification rights, and award her at the very least $3 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

She is represented by Lynnfield lawyer Richard Chambers, who is without doubt one of the state’s handful of go-to Covid-19 legal professionals, though he has misplaced plenty of circumstances, together with one introduced by a group of Boston residents, employees and cops who sought $6 million every for the alleged hurt carried out to them by the town’s three-month-long requirement to indicate proof of vaccination to get into public indoor areas, all of whom had their circumstances dismissed.

O’Connell labored for Newton Public Faculties between August, 2017 and her firing on Jan. 26, 2022, when “her civil rights have been violated and she or he was unlawfully and wrongfully terminated by the Defendant based mostly on her asserting her sincerely held spiritual beliefs by requesting an spiritual exemption to taking the Covid-19 vaccine.”

Plaintiff acknowledged that the “Covid vaccine … is a contradiction to [her] Orthodox religion” and that her “Church expresses its categorical opposition to conducting experiments on human embryonic cells”.

NPS unlawfully and wrongly denied Plaintiff’s request for a spiritual exemption after summarily alleging that Plaintiff’s “objection was a private objection and never based mostly upon a deeply held spiritual perception” regardless of Plaintiff’s competition unequivocally and clearly detailing that NPS’s Vaccine Coverage conflicted along with her deeply held spiritual beliefs.

Or as O’Connell put it in her formal request for a spiritual exemption:

In Matthew 9:12 we’re informed that Jesus mentioned, “It isn’t the wholesome who want a health care provider, however the sick.” I don’t routinely obtain the flu vaccine. I’m a agency believer of therapeutics, as Matthew states in that passage, however don’t consider in placing pointless medicines – significantly these whose effectiveness stays to be decided – into my physique.

I consider God has a plan for me, as he does for all of his youngsters. I consider because of this I used to be contaminated with the illness this previous summer time. I endured the worst of it and luckily made a full restoration. This was my path. I consider half of God’s plan for me was to expertise the illness and to develop pure immunity. However allow us to not overlook, God helps those that assist themselves. I dwell a wholesome, lively life-style – I train every day, eat a nutrient-dense food regimen an guarantee I get enough sleep every night time.

Not talked about within the criticism: Photograph of Archbishop Elpidophoros, head of the Greek Orthodox Church in America, receiving a Covid-19 shot.

However even other than the spiritual angle, Newton colleges illegally practiced drugs in the way in which it made workers get a shot with a variety of doubtless harmful well being results, the criticism avers:

However the uncomfortable side effects, dangers and lack of security, Defendant demanded that each one of its workers obtain experimental medical remedies. By advising its workers to take medical remedies as a situation of employment, Defendant was training drugs and making medical choices and judgments for its workers with out a medical license, with out enough medical coaching and with out knowledgeable data concerning the uncomfortable side effects and dangers and advantages of the Covid-19 vaccine medical remedies.

Defendant incentivized its workers to obtain the vaccine and demanded that all of them, together with Plaintiff, obtain the Covid vaccine as a brand new requirement of continued employment.

Defendant demanded that its workers obtain experimental medical remedies with out offering its workers with requisite info together with Plaintiff to make her personal choice whether or not the medical process prevents her from contracting or spreading the illness.

It is an argument that may not play properly in Boston federal courts, the place judges have just lately held that employers had the suitable to take heed to federal consultants and require photographs in the midst of a pandemic.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles